TJC
The hospital manages imaging safety risks.
TJC NPG.13.03.01
Source text
7 segments
TJC NPG.13.03.01
TJC NPG.13.03.01
The hospital manages imaging safety risks.
(1)
The hospital manages magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety risks associated with the following: - Patients who may experience claustrophobia, anxiety, or emotional distress - Patients who may require urgent or emergent medical care - Patients with medical implants, devices, or imbedded metallic foreign objects (such as shrapnel) - Ferromagnetic objects entering the MRI environment - Acoustic noise
(2)
The hospital manages magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety risks by doing the following: - Restricting access of everyone not trained in MRI safety or screened by staff trained in MRI safety from the scanner room and the area that immediately precedes the entrance to the MRI scanner room. - Making sure that these restricted areas are controlled by and under the direct supervision of staff trained in MRI safety. - Posting signage at the entrance to the MRI scanner room that conveys that potentially dangerous magnetic fields are present in the room. Signage should also indicate that the magnet is always on except in cases where the MRI system, by its design, can have its magnetic field routinely turned on and off by the operator.
(3)
For hospitals that provide computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), nuclear medicine (NM), or fluoroscopy services: The radiation safety officer, diagnostic medical physicist, or health physicist reviews the results of dosimetry monitoring at least quarterly to assess whether staff radiation exposure levels are “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA) and below regulatory limits. Note 1: For the definition of ALARA, please refer to US Nuclear Regulatory Commission federal regulation 10 CFR 20.1003. Note 2: This element of performance does not apply to dental cone beam CT radiographic imaging studies performed for diagnosis of conditions affecting the maxillofacial region or to obtain guidance for the treatment of such conditions.
(4)
For diagnostic computed tomography (CT) services: At least annually, a diagnostic medical physicist does the following: - Measures the radiation dose (in the form of volume computed tomography dose index [CTDIvol]) produced by each diagnostic CT imaging system for the following four CT protocols: adult brain, adult abdomen, pediatric brain, and pediatric abdomen. If one or more of these protocols is not used by the hospital, other commonly used CT protocols may be substituted. - Verifies that the radiation dose (in the form of CTDIvol) produced and measured for each protocol tested is within 20 percent of the CTDIvol displayed on the CT console. The dates, results, and verifications of these measurements are documented. Note 1: This element of performance is only applicable for systems capable of calculating and displaying radiation doses. Note 2: This element of performance does not apply to dental cone beam CT radiographic imaging studies performed for diagnosis of conditions affecting the maxillofacial region or to obtain guidance for the treatment of such conditions. Note 3: Medical physicists are accountable for these activities. They may be assisted with the testing and evaluation of equipment performance by individuals who have the required training and skills, as determined by the physicist. (For more information, refer to HR.11.01.03, EP 1; HR.11.02.01, EP 2; NPG.12.04.01, EP 3)
(5)
For diagnostic computed tomography (CT) services: At least annually, a diagnostic medical physicist conducts a performance evaluation of all CT imaging equipment. The evaluation results, along with recommendations for correcting any problems identified, are documented. The evaluation includes the use of phantoms to assess the following imaging metrics: - Image uniformity - Scout prescription accuracy - Alignment light accuracy - Table travel accuracy - Radiation beam width - High-contrast resolution - Low-contrast detectability - Geometric or distance accuracy - CT number accuracy and uniformity - Artifact evaluation Note 1: This element of performance does not apply to dental cone beam CT radiographic imaging studies performed for diagnosis of conditions affecting the maxillofacial region or to obtain guidance for the treatment of such conditions. Note 2: Medical physicists are accountable for these activities. They may be assisted with the testing and evaluation of equipment performance by individuals who have the required training and skills, as determined by the physicist. (For more information, refer to HR.11.01.03, EP 1; HR.11.02.01, EP 2; NPG.12.04.01, EP 3)
(6)
At least annually, a diagnostic medical physicist or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scientist conducts a performance evaluation of all MRI imaging equipment. The evaluation results, along with recommendations for correcting any problems identified, are documented. The evaluation includes the use of phantoms to assess the following imaging metrics: - Image uniformity for all radiofrequency (RF) coils used clinically - Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for all coils used clinically - Slice thickness accuracy - Slice position accuracy - Alignment light accuracy - High-contrast resolution - Low-contrast resolution (or contrast-to-noise ratio) - Geometric or distance accuracy - Magnetic field homogeneity - Artifact evaluation Note: Medical physicists or MRI scientists are accountable for these activities. They may be assisted with the testing and evaluation of equipment performance by individuals who have the required training and skills, as determined by the medical physicist or MRI scientist. (For more information, refer to HR.11.01.03, EP 1; HR.11.02.01, EP 2; NPG.12.04.01, EP 3)
Source outline
6 anchors in this source
